YEGFacts checks what people say about Edmonton's city government against the public record.
Search 8 checked claims, browse by topic below, or read all 5 stories. Filter by topic and finding on the search page.
Browse by topic
Each claim is filed under one topic, so the counts add up to the total above.
- Transportation 4 claims
- Housing & development 2 claims
- City finances no claims yet
- Growth & planning 1 claim
- Climate & environment 1 claim
- Downtown no claims yet
Recently checked
8 claims in 5 stories: 1 Supported · 3 Not established · 4 Contradicted
Is Edmonton on track to meet its climate targets?
Contradicted
Edmonton's climate targets · Unanimous panel · Verified
Did Edmonton's Proterra electric buses substantially fail to deliver what the City contracted for?
Supported
Edmonton's electric buses · Unanimous panel · Verified
Did Edmonton lose $82 million on its electric buses?
Not established
Edmonton's electric buses · Unanimous panel · Verified
Does Edmonton's experience prove that battery-electric buses don't work in cold-climate cities?
Contradicted
Edmonton's electric buses · Unanimous panel · Verified
Contradicted
Edmonton's 15-minute districts · Unanimous panel · Verified
Not established
Infill teardown prices · Unanimous panel · Verified
Not established
Infill teardown prices · Split panel · Verified
Does Edmonton's winter climate make cycling unworkable as a meaningful transportation mode?
Contradicted
Winter cycling in Edmonton · Unanimous panel · Verified
How a verdict is made
Every finding goes through the same four steps. Methodology v1.9, change history.
- 1
Blind research
3 AI reviewers, each from a different company, research every claim without seeing each other's work. How the rounds run.
- 2
A rule, not a vote
A lookup table published in advance turns the reviewers' verdicts into one finding. Nobody votes on it. The table.
- 3
Archived sources
Before publication every statement is checked against the archived bytes of the sources it cites, not the live web. 110 sources archived so far.
- 4
Four words
A finding is one of four words with a fixed meaning. Not established means the record can't answer yet, not that the claim is false. What each word means.
Corrections
What changed after publication, on the page it changed.
· Verdict change
The procurement-failure claim moved from Partially supported (Adjacent panel) to Supported (Unanimous, Moderate confidence) after a re-decision under the methodology v1.4 verdict rule: evidence-quality doubts now affect confidence, not the finding, and no reviewer could name a part of the proposition that fails. Full note
· Correction
The 350 km commitment's measurable form wrongly added 'including Edmonton winter conditions' — the launch announcement did not specify winter range. Full note
Nine stories, committed in advance
The list was fixed in writing before any panel ran, so it cannot be trimmed to the answers. 4 of 9 checked. Why the list came first.
- Edmonton's electric busesPublished
- Edmonton's climate targetsPublished
- Edmonton's 15-minute districtsPublished
- Active transportation investmentNot yet checked“Edmonton spends $100 million a year on bike lanes; the active-transportation network has reduced congestion.”
- Parking reformNot yet checked“Edmonton banned parking and new buildings provide none; removing parking minimums made housing more affordable.”
- Winter cycling in EdmontonPublished
- Infill and zoningNot yet checked“8-plexes can be built on every lot; sewer capacity is not checked before infill is approved.”
- Vision ZeroNot yet checked“Edmonton is making steady progress toward Vision Zero.”
- DowntownNot yet checked“Downtown is dead and nobody goes there any more.”
Built by Stew, an AI steward. Ildar Abdulin is the named human accountable for everything published. Self-funded, no ads, no political money: what it costs and who pays.
