Browse by topic
A question can sit under more than one topic, so these do not add up to the total above.
- Transportation34 questions
- Bike lanes and cycling30 questions
- City hall and council9 questions
- Housing & development6 questions
- City finances14 questions
- Growth & planning4 questions
- Climate & environment2 questions
- Downtown2 questions
Recently checked
20 claims under 9 questions: 5 Supported · 7 Partially supported · 4 Not established · 4 Contradicted
Did the committee cut bike-lane speakers from five minutes to three, with about 70 waiting to speak?
Supported
Yes. Edmonton's Infrastructure Committee cut speakers' time limit from five minutes to three, when 64 entries were listed to speak on the bike lanes, though the 52 recorded as speaking fall short of about seventy.
What the records show about Edmonton's August 2026 bike-lane hearing · VerifiedPartially supported
Partly. Council's Infrastructure Committee neither adopted nor voted down administration's plan for 14 bike routes, and full Council had not decided it by September 25 in the records the reviewers read.
Edmonton's bike routes and the August 2026 committee vote · VerifiedDid Edmonton's administration recommend freezing 14 future bike routes to reassess them?
Partially supported
Partly. Administration's original plan would have taken 14 bike routes out of the program for 2026 and 2027, but its latest only set them aside without saying they would wait. Its middle version held them back too.
Edmonton's bike routes and the August 2026 committee vote · VerifiedPartially supported
Partly. Councillors Karen Principe and Jennifer Rice brought two cuts to Edmonton's bike-lane budget and council voted both down, but only one would have left about $50 million.
Edmonton's bike routes and the August 2026 committee vote · VerifiedSupported
Yes. Counting a proposal once it is on a published agenda, administration had at least two snow proposals seeking more money before council or a committee by August 27, 2026, and we found three. None of them states the snow budget it would add to, so on a stricter reading that requires the snow budget each would add to, none would count, and if the comment meant precisely two, it is partly right.
What the records show about Edmonton's snow clearing and its costs · VerifiedWere Edmonton's roads in poor condition in the City's latest published ratings?
Partially supported
Partly. The City's latest ratings put about a ninth of Edmonton's roads in poor or very poor condition at the end of 2024, counting them by what they would cost to replace.
Is Edmonton letting roads go while funding bike lanes? · VerifiedPartially supportedSplit panel
Partly. The City's budget lists all $100 million as general borrowing that road or alley renewal could have used, but one of the three AI reviewers could not open that budget to check.
Is Edmonton letting roads go while funding bike lanes? · VerifiedPartially supported
Partly. The $100 million came to about a fifteenth of the renewal the City said it could not fund from 2023 to 2026, too much to dismiss and far short of a serious share.
Is Edmonton letting roads go while funding bike lanes? · Verified
How a verdict is made
Every finding goes through the same four steps. Methodology v1.43, change history.
Blind research
On the newest finding, 3 AI reviewer seats from 2 companies researched the claim without seeing each other's work; seats that share a company are not independent of each other. Every finding names its own panel. How the rounds run.
A rule, not a vote
A lookup table published in advance turns the reviewers' verdicts into one finding. Nobody votes on it. The table.
Archived sources
Before publication every statement is checked against the archived bytes of the sources it cites, not the live web. 285 sources archived so far.
Four words
A finding is one of four words with a fixed meaning. Not established means the record can't answer yet, not that the claim is false. What each word means.
Every question we've considered, including the ones we parked and declined.
Corrections
What changed after publication, on the page it changed.
· Correction
Fourteen sources this page relies on can no longer be checked against their recorded hashes, because we lost our archived copies of them. Full note
· Correction
Do Edmonton's 15-minute districts limit where people can travel?
Our evidence page for the Council minutes still placed the freedom-of-movement amendment at second reading. Full note
· Correction
The opening called 621 the size of the thread. Full note
· Verdict change
What happened with Edmonton's electric buses?
The procurement-failure claim moved from Partially supported (Adjacent panel) to Supported (Unanimous, Moderate confidence) after a re-decision under the methodology v1.4 verdict rule: evidence-quality doubts now affect confidence, not the finding, and no reviewer could name a part of the proposition that fails. Full note
· Correction
What happened with Edmonton's electric buses?
The 350 km commitment's measurable form wrongly added 'including Edmonton winter conditions' — the launch announcement did not specify winter range. Full note