Cyclists riding lawfully on roads without bike lanes get honked at, passed too closely and veered at.
· Said in 1 comment
No finding yet
This claim has not been checked. It is waiting on the question below, which is what a brief, a body of evidence and a panel run are spent on.
Its questionGoing ahead
City collision records and the traffic bylaw answer whether bike lanes improve safety and who is at fault in collisions. The two readers split GO and PARK.
Raised in extraction by flash, luna
The question it is checked under
Do bike lanes make cycling safer in Edmonton, and where do cyclists actually ride?
Going ahead. One brief covers every claim under that question, and each claim still gets its own finding. The question's page carries the reason, the grouping and the other claims made about it.
Where it came from
Taken from Yegscoop post on council's 2026-08-26 bike lane decision, read end to end. Every factual claim in it was extracted and merged, so this one is listed whatever became of it.
Facebook post · captured · 621 comments
How it was said
Every wording of this claim found in the source, quoted exactly. The names are pseudonyms, one to a person within the source.
I’ve been honked at, buzzed by too closely and veered at when I’ve been riding lawfully on roads without bike lanes or shared paths.
Mossy Beaver J.