Skip to content
YEGFacts.ca

YF-EV-0141

Bike and Pedestrian Counts (Eco Counter), dataset tq23-qn4m: monthly bicycle counts across the whole network, 2018-08 to 2026-09

https://data.edmonton.ca/resource/tq23-qn4m.json?%24select=date_trunc_ym%28log_timestamp%29+AS+month%2C+sum%28total_cyclist_count%29+AS+bicycle_count%2C+count%28%2A%29+AS+records&%24group=month&%24order=month&%24limit=500

What this source can establish

The City's own monthly bicycle counts for every automated counter it publishes, as an aggregate of dataset tq23-qn4m taken on 2026-09-04. Any network total over a range of whole months is a sum of these rows: January to July 2026 is 1,291,714, the same window in 2025 is 1,611,749 and in 2024 is 1,547,532, calendar 2025 is 2,856,631 and July 2025 alone is 436,863. It establishes counted passages past fixed points and nothing about how many people or journeys they represent.

Record

Publisher
City of Edmonton
Kind
observed-data
Published
2025-04-25
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Redistribution
unclear
Archive
original archive lost; see the audit record
SHA-256
9fd8f92e7de299575aa86ffdcb3153a5f6f55c7b416829c5f03029a73ca95caa

The archived copy this hash identifies, retrieved 2026-09-04, was lost on or before 2026-10-02. The recorded hash is unchanged. The same URL was fetched again on 2026-10-02 and registered as YF-EV-0319. The fresh copy's bytes differ from the recorded hash; the source may have changed since 2026-09-04, or the publisher may serve different bytes on each request. The audit found the content itself changed: this copy includes a month, 2026-10, after the panel read the data. Either way, the published claims still cite this entry. Audit record: https://yegfacts.ca/methodology/audits/archive-loss-2026-10-02

City of Edmonton open data served through Socrata; the archived bytes carry no redistribution grant. Fails closed to private.

Verify independently

Fetch the original and hash it: if the bytes still match the SHA-256 above, you have the same document we read. We no longer hold the copy we read on , so we cannot verify against it if the page has changed. The audit record says what still supports each finding that cites this source.

Used by