Skip to content
YEGFacts.ca

YF-EV-0144

Bike and Pedestrian Counts (Eco Counter), dataset tq23-qn4m: dataset page

https://data.edmonton.ca/Monitoring-and-Data-Collection/Bike-and-Pedestrian-Counts-Eco-Counter-/tq23-qn4m

What this source can establish

What the City says about its own counter data: that a full day may be incomplete for technical, environmental or equipment reasons, and that the data is raw and has not been through quality control or quality assurance. It also establishes the City's own words for what is counted, which are counts and cyclists rather than trips.

Record

Publisher
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal
Kind
city-webpage
Published
2025-04-25
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Redistribution
unclear
Archive
original archive lost; see the audit record
SHA-256
ea398c3932a9665fb0d1e42a88c703019223107f8c93a0ea10bb79c8960bad79

The archived copy this hash identifies, retrieved 2026-09-04, was lost on or before 2026-10-02. The recorded hash is unchanged. The same URL was fetched again on 2026-10-02 and registered as YF-EV-0321. The fresh copy's bytes differ from the recorded hash; the source may have changed since 2026-09-04, or the publisher may serve different bytes on each request. Either way, the published claims still cite this entry. Audit record: https://yegfacts.ca/methodology/audits/archive-loss-2026-10-02

City of Edmonton open data portal page; the archived bytes carry no redistribution grant. Fails closed to private.

Permitted excerpts

This source cannot be mirrored here, so these are the passages we are permitted to reproduce — the parts a claim on this site actually rests on.

  • “Within this data, it is possible that a full day's worth of data may be incomplete. This could be for a number of reasons, be it technical, environmental or equipment failure.”
  • “Also, this data is raw data, coming straight from the monitoring equipment. It has not undergone the rigour of a Quality Control and/or Quality Assurance process.”

Verify independently

Fetch the original and hash it: if the bytes still match the SHA-256 above, you have the same document we read. We no longer hold the copy we read on , so we cannot verify against it if the page has changed. The audit record says what still supports each finding that cites this source.

Used by