Skip to content
On this page

Do Edmonton's bike lanes ease traffic congestion or make it worse?

· Said in 34 comments · 6 claims

Going ahead

Before-and-after traffic counts and travel times on converted corridors can show whether reallocating lanes changed congestion, while the general claim about roads carrying services adds nothing checkable.

How far the work has got
Registered
Whether it is worth checking
Going ahead
What a reader can see
Not published yet

The City's record of which lanes it reallocated, plus traffic counts and travel times on those corridors, answers both directions and shows what else the road carries.

People arguing in both directions raised this question, and every claim they made about it is checked, whichever way it points.

What the states mean

Where it came from

Taken from Yegscoop post on council's 2026-08-26 bike lane decision, read end to end. Every factual claim in it was extracted and merged, so this question is listed whatever became of it.

Facebook post · captured · 621 comments

The names below are pseudonyms, one to a commenter within this source.

The original post

The claims under it

  1. Taking traffic lanes for bike lanes increases congestion, slows traffic and causes idling and emissions.

    Said in 13 comments

    • Removing traffic lanes for cyclists and increasing the number of crossings increase congestion.

      Granite Hare D.

    • nope, it causes it.

      Bright Goose S.

    • they force traffic into one lane not two, impede turns, slow the flow of traffic significantly causing idling which creates more emissions.

      Rustic Hare L.

    • Now instead of 2 lanes you now have one. Now you have more cars backed up and more carbon

      Windy Bison C.

    • turn a two lane each way into a one lane each way so that cyclist feel safe, how exactly are you reducing congestion? Now that one lane is permanently unuseable for cars

      Riverside Bluejay S.

    • not have them idoling while bike lanes are not being used.

      Rustic Moose R.

    • It will also increase congestion in some areas.

      Misty Heron R.

    • what was once 2 lanes of moving traffic is now one.

      Prairie Waxwing D.

    • there design does nothing but hinder traffic flow.

      Amber Marmot E.

    • taking away from roadways (both in driving lanes and in roadside parking) adds to the congestion you see.

      Bright Chickadee P.

    • without contesting our streets more?

      Dusty Bluejay G.

    • lanes that obstruct traffic

      Foggy Crow C.

    • there's year round maintenance, huge traffic congestion and related pollution

      Bright Grebe R.

  2. Cycling infrastructure reduces motor-vehicle congestion because every person who bikes is one less car on the road.

    Said in 11 comments

    • Using a bicycle helps reduce traffic congestion.

      Quiet Goose B.

    • Bike infrastructure reduces traffic congestion

      Riverside Merlin T.

    • The more cycling infrastructure there is, the fewer people there are driving in cars. The fewer people driving, the better Edmonton's traffic situation gets.

      Granite Vole D.

    • if you want less traffic congestion then start biking.

      Misty Hare K.

    • And every person who takes the bike lane is one less car, reducing congestion.

      Cedar Pelican C.

    • every person who chooses to bike is one less car. The more comfortable and safe cycling is, the fewer cars we have on the road

      Cedar Pelican C.

    • giving people viable alternatives to driving reduces traffic congestion

      Cedar Pelican C.

    • fewer cars on the road resulting in less congestion, less pollution(noise and air), and a healthier population reducing health care costs

      Cedar Pelican C.

    • every person on a bike is one less car in front of you!

      Granite Beaver P.

    • drivers also benefit from bike lanes as every person on a bike is one less person in front of you in traffic in a car!

      Granite Beaver P.

    • the better they are the more people will choose them instead of driving

      Cedar Pelican C.

  3. The City has removed motor-vehicle traffic lanes across Edmonton and replaced them with bike lanes.

    Said in 5 comments

    • 102nd Ave between 121st and 111th. Used to be 2 ways, now one way with a bike lane. 102 Ave east of 109 St also reduced traffic lanes for bicycle lanes.

      Granite Hare D.

    • they absolutely have removed traffic lanes all throughout the city

      Boreal Crow K.

    • The city is removing traffic lanes all throughout the city for bike lanes

      Boreal Crow K.

    • they sure have removed Traffic lanes and replaced with bike lanes! Just check out what they did on 132nd ave!

      Golden Sparrow J.

    • remove a vehicle lane for a bike lane

      Prairie Waxwing D.

  4. Roads carry the goods, services, buses and emergency vehicles society depends on.

    Said in 2 comments

    • Roads also move the goods and services need by society

      Granite Hare D.

    • service vehicles to move products; bus transportation to move people; ambulances to save lives; fire trucks to do the same

      Bright Elk G.

  5. 79 Street carries traffic that would otherwise use 75 Street and is a school-run route for parents.

    Said in 1 comment

    • It is an important street for alleviating traffic from 75 St and for people to navigate & drive their kids to school before work.

      Hardy Vole C.

  6. Edmonton is removing lanes for traffic calming, not for cyclists, and adding bike lanes where that work is already happening.

    Said in 2 comments

    • they are not removing lanes for cyclists. They are removing lanes for traffic calming measures and in places where applicable putting bike Lanes there to save money combining the two.

      Riverside Muskrat A.

    • Even if they had never planned bike lanes for hermatige road they are still getting traffic calming measures

      Riverside Muskrat A.